The person knowingly commits the crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Crimes and criminal activities are now significant problems in our society. Any kind of criminal threat to our humanity and problem for our society. Different laws had been implemented to tackle various crime and criminals. Once a person has a stigma of a criminal, the society never trusts him or her. The person who committed crime knowingly should not retain any civil rights, I can not completely agree to the statement, and provide sufficient examples to bolster my stance.
First of all, our societies have codes of conducts and criminals might have broken them but our society also has laws to punish them. Criminal punished by the law and their crime intensity. So, we must know what crime he had committed and what intensity or how serious it was and at what situation. FRo example, if a homeless person steals food to feed his or family it may not be as serious as committing a murder, and refrain him from getting any social benefits can make the situation far abysmal. If the homeless person punished as a murderer then the next crime he commits might be a murder.
Besides, our societies have created laws to tackle the crimes and the criminal had been already punished by the law and lost their part of their life. Again punish them in our society by abridging their social benefits and earn money by laboring could fester the situation. Then he might not have another path to choose and commits a crime again to fulfill his needs. There was an incident where a young person tries to steal food from a convenience store the storekeeper caught him but instead of calling the cops he gave his food as the boy was homeless and he had to feed his siblings. So, we can prevent crimes before they happened. If that boy goes to jail he might come out and commits a crime again. Depending on the situation we should judge crimes and if our societies could be more flexible then we can prevent criminal activities.
On the other hand, there are many crimes for which we should be serious, for example, terrorist activities or violence against women or murder for power as cold-hearted. Not only the law punished them as serious as they could also our human society exile them. They do not deserve any empathy from human society. Any kind of social benefit from labor.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say that laws punished the criminal and treat very criminal as same by our society is unfeasible. The criminal already tagged as unsocial humans and our societies do not take them back. We should judge the crime by its' gravity and the situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | Mithil | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Gnyana | 62 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | Yam Kumar Oli | 50 | view |
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole. 66
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 58
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 66
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most co 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: For
...w serious it was and at what situation. FRo example, if a homeless person steals fo...
^^^
Line 3, column 801, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...if our societies could be more flexible then we can prevent criminal activities. On...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, so, then, for example, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66814159292 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42624382457 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45796460177 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9190800086 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9166666667 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 21.0 5.13820224719 409% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228573945129 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772586228381 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730202472522 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138437873808 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558379754008 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.