ecoturism
Now a days tourists are opting more for eco-tourism, this is due to the fact that they one to be more relate to nature. The document states that eco-tourism helps development, provides new jobs and preserves natural landscapes.
First, the preservation of natural landscapes develop the surrounding areas by providing locals the offers of new jobs like hotels, activities, tours and other attractions.
Also, eco-tourism helps natural environments not to be polluted and/or damage by those who want to exploit the natural resources.
But, in the lecture the professor put in evidence the cons of green-tourism, such as corruption, damage in locals’ culture, pollution and damage in the eco-system.
Green-tourism offers locals jobs such as guards to protect the environment, but these can be easily bribed to take advantage of natural resources. Furthermore, the locals’ culture is heavily damaged due to globalization.
Even though tourists are more nature conscient, they cannot avoid the pollute and/or damage their surroundings. Also, the creation of access’ to these places involves the destruction of surrounding eco-systems.
In conclusion, even though people tend to associate eco-tourism as a healthy and nature friendly option, these do not come as nature friendly as one would think.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
Now a days tourists are opting more for eco-touris...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 67, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ore nature conscient, they cannot avoid the pollute and/or damage their surroundings. Also,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6432160804 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21366115038 2.5805825403 125% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592964824121 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7765008018 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.8541721854 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.