Bar Chart : Percentage Participate of men in senior development position.
The figure elucidates the rate of male participation in senior development position between 1980 to 2010. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable alterations occurred for the number of IBM percentage in comparison with other aspects.
To begin with, 1980 to 2000 witnessed a moderate growth for the amount of males participation for Microsoft in which it, initially, stood at just below a tenth and achieved at well under a fifth in 2000, afterwards, it uplifted tremendously to well above four-tenths in the next 10 years. Following the same pattern as Microsoft, in the first five years, the total of males participation for IBM remained stable, and unexpectedly, it increased dramatically in between 1985, which made up at well less than 10%, and 2010, which constituted at 6 in 10.
In contrast, there was a gradual palpitation for the amount of males who participated in Apple. At first, it upright positioned at well under two-tenths and finished approximately at a quarter by the end of the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- the changes of merton from 1990 to 2012. 78
- Some people believe that advertising brings positive effects. Others argue that this has more negative effects. What extent do you agree? 78
- Bar Chart sales in number for science fiction novel history and poetry 94
- Line graph : global water use by sector.Table : water consumption in brazil in Congo in 2000. 73
- Divorce rates in Finland and Sweden. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04678362573 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1006507523 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625730994152 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8814865432 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.833333333 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0877609664354 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594870056705 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624206995097 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774299485763 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618631727213 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.