Nowadays, children play less with others and this has an impact on their development.
What are the reasons for this?
Does it have a good or a bad effect on children
In this highly modernized era, lack of interaction between children is gradually becoming serious and alarming. There are numerous reasons leading to this phenomenon. From my perspective, it is obvious that this issue causes a huge negative influence on children.
Electronic device overuse is considered to be the first and foremost factor leading to this problem. In details, these remarkable progress in technology industry creates plenties of useful, attractive and modern applications and websites such as Facebook, Twitter, online games and so on. Thereafter, the number of young people who are addicted to these harmful temptation is increasing dramatically day by day. Secondly, learning pressure is also another reason which cannot be ignored. It is undeniable that most parents expect their daughters and sons to have high achievements in their schools. Hence, these expectation actually forces children to put themselves into a severe studying condition which doesn't allow them to spend more time on outdoor activities.
Besides, in my point of view, the absence of company certainly results in a bad effect on children’ future. Regarding of these negative affection of this phenomenon, the consequences that children have to suffer are not only the obstacles in social relationships but also the shortage of important social skills, for example: communication ability and teamwork soft skills. Additionally, self-isolation could be the main cause of mental health illnesses. In clarification, children who hang out less with others could have these feelings of inferiority in childhood and eventually adulthood. Hence, these mental problems will definitely desperate barriers for these children in varied aspects.
In conclusion, people should raise awareness of the fact that studying pressure and high technology applications will be able to bring on the unavailability of social integration in children. Moreover, it is clear that this phenomenon negatively affects children’ development in both their mental health and future.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-13 | dlswife | 90 | view |
2019-05-26 | Lê Phạm Nhật Quỳnh | 77 | view |
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 61
- Nowadays children play less with others and this has an impact on their development What are the reasons for this Does it have a good or a bad effect on children 77
- nfluence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 67
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think it should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for you 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a huge negative influence on children. Electronic device overuse is considered ...
^^^
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this expectation' or 'these expectations'?
Suggestion: this expectation; these expectations
...h achievements in their schools. Hence, these expectation actually forces children to put themsel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... into a severe studying condition which doesnt allow them to spend more time on outdoo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, hence, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75163398693 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11665349126 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630718954248 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0794418039 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279194491919 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872392882791 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593136782914 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172016800944 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592693073506 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.