Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
For whole globe traffic congestion is a grave issue. A recent decade are witness of development in infrastructure sector. Amid this development there is one phenomenon that has associated with it. According to this phenomenon a faction of people argue that railway train or Subway lines should be built up while other advocate that making wider road is a possible solution to decline the traffic inside the city. I will try to throw light upon both view that are related to traffic issue. I also will try to posit my perspective.
To commence with there are multifarious reason to shore those people who are in favor of building up wider roads. The predominant advantage is from winder road, traffic can be mitigated at alarming rate and but larger road may be encouraged the citizen to by more vehicle. The fact is that this may led to increase intensity in short-term. In addition the idea of larger road has short terms benefits and it would be congested in nearby future which will higher than current position. Furthermore, larger roads means more vehicles and it indirectly affect to atmosphere pollution. As it emits exhaust gases such as CO2 or Co these may contaminate the air which is taken in breadth and it is more likely that people have to suffer from hazardous disease.
On the other side of spectrum, there are several advantages of set up the trains and subways for commuting. The first advantage is it may be made in consider to environment so, it called eco-friendly. Government should spent major portion of budget on improving the railway or metros. Because it is convenient and reliable for all people as well as it is cheaper that private vehicle. Besides local authorities should continue campaigns to raise awareness among people about benefits of tubes or trains. Furthermore, administration should also spend money on other factor that are more critical than traffic congestion such as deforestation and extinction of animal breed.
Aggelomerating, all the points I elaborated it can be concluded that improvement in trains and underground railways has more benefits rather the expand the road size. While larger road has short-term solution, trains and tubes has long-term determination but it has needed much awareness of people. That is why, I support that declaration that has connected to large portion of money should be spent on betterment of trains. It is more fruitful in my opinion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | MOHETH CHOWDARI | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Lynn2309 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Dao Thu Ha | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 77
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 73
- The world natural resources are consumed at an ever-increased rate. What are the dangers of this situation? What should we do? 56
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 73
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...to increase intensity in short-term. In addition the idea of larger road has short terms...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...n current position. Furthermore, larger roads means more vehicles and it indirectly a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...s means more vehicles and it indirectly affect to atmosphere pollution. As it emits ex...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...round railways has more benefits rather the expand the road size. While larger road has sh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, while, in addition, in short, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02729528536 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84111846646 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533498759305 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3232667385 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0909090909 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3181818182 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.59090909091 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237841545196 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597043705326 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501780207382 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138700204083 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233256183665 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.