In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?

Essay topics:

In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?

It is said that authorities should impose heavier taxes on private cars to mitigate the traffic issues and utilize the money for public transportation development. In my opinion, I strongly reckon that this solution brings more harm than good.
On the one hand, the raise of private car taxes used for public transport enhancement has brought certain values. Firstly, heavy taxes would discourage the use of owners’ cars to a certain extent since it is likely to be too expensive. Moreover, much more public transports such as buses, trams would be taken advantages of if the public systems are improved. To illustrate, many people would rather not travel from and to work by bus or train due to its poor light system and shabby seats so that money from taxes can make necessary changes to facilitate these situations.
On the other hand, this measure exerts more pernicious impacts than positive ones. It cannot be denied that higher taxes put a financial burden on the car drivers. At present, people already had to pay a great amount of money for their cars so further taxes would mean less money to be saved at the end of month for someone who have no choice but have to drive. Furthermore, it creates an unfair society owing to discrimination between poor and wealthy people. To be more specific, the rich can afford the increased tax whilst ones with less money would have difficulties.
In conclusion, although some people agree with the idea of rising money on private cars for public transportations, I personally believe that its cons far outweigh its pros.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-08 Jenny213987 78 view
2019-08-21 siva Pra 56 view
2019-08-21 siva Pra 56 view
2019-06-03 dkklinkkk 56 view
2019-06-03 hangduan94@gmail.com 61 view
Essays by user hangduan94@gmail.com :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91011235955 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66209682922 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632958801498 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2150678188 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236122513375 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086158646636 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065572969448 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146345516987 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523017186289 0.056905535591 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.