schools have several problems with students’ behaviour
The attitude of young people in school has been considerable problems happened in most countries. Time which is consumed to watch television and get in video games is the cause of aggression of young generation nowadays.
Watching TV can be impacted students attitude, and this is because the more violent television subjects watch at teenagers, the more serious is their aggressive behaviours. For instance, the research conducted in two Pondok Kelapa, East Jakarta, elementary schools, and observed that students in one school underwent a 6-month program designed to limit their TV use, while the others did not. Both groups of schoolchildren had similar reports of hostile at the beginning of study, and after a program finished, however, the two group had very real different characteristics. The data, published in January 2001 issue of Pediatric Medicine, found that third and fourth grade students who took part in a curriculum to reduce their time on TV engaged in fewer acts of verbal and physical aggression than their peers.
Another cause of rude behaviours of schoolkids is playing deadly electronic game. This regular engagement of dangerous electronic game will produce point of view in young school kids to act violently. For example, among the most noteworthy studies is Dr Melissa, which found that exposure to video game violence in childhood is the strongest predictor of aggressive tendency in life.
To sum up, it’s clearly stated that TV and video games exposures will impact in the behaviour of schoolchildren. Where possible, parents should encouraged children to utilise their time more selectively, and both TV and video game, as a medium, promotes aggression and violence, and the best solution to reduce those bad attitudes is to turn it off.
- The different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city from 1960 to 2000 67
- the quantity of Japanese who travel out of Japan from 1985 to 1990 and the market proportion of Japanese tourist traveling to Australia 67
- schools have several problems with students’ behaviour 78
- The number of wheat exports in Canada, EU, and Australia 78
- The different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city from 1960 to 2000 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, third, while, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28873239437 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86844566959 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616197183099 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6623973799 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.545454545 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110838956956 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04502641651 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432630560117 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637093119237 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00949149994029 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.