Wealthy nations should assist pooper countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that rich countries should support the developing nations in the events of natural catastrophe. This essay agrees with this statement because wealthy nations have enough money as well as it is their moral obligation to do so.
Developed countries are liable to financially upheld their poor counterparts during natural calamities as they have enough monetary resources. This is because under-developed countries lacks the primary health facilities and financial resources to overcome the effect of such natural phenomenons and there is greater chances for the death toll to increase tremendously due to outburst of diseases and inadequate facilities under the absence of such international aids. For example, in the 1990 severe earthquake that occurred in Egypt, a large number of people who were buried under the buildings were rescued by the Italian team who extended their humanitarian aid to Egypt.
Moreover, it is also the responsibility of the developed world to ensure that poor nations are financially stable enough to safeguard their citizens from such natural disasters as this helps improve the mutual relationship between two nations ensuring world peace and economic prosperity. For instance, during the 2016 flood in india, UAE extended a financial aid to India which helped improve the economic relation between both the countries.
In conclusion, disaster relief funds are a better way to improve the bond between developed and developing world and it is obligatory on the part of rich countries to extend a helping hand in the time of an hour as they are financially stable.
- Wealthy nations should assist pooper countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets. Other people prefer to do their food shopping online.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 56
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are greater chances'?
Suggestion: there are greater chances
... effect of such natural phenomenons and there is greater chances for the death toll to increase tremendo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...vere earthquake that occurred in Egypt, a large number of people who were buried under the buildi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35826771654 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89747998971 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566929133858 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3605027888 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.125 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.75 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176863914257 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839765960445 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593573000312 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113524574408 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822113138562 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.