It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the state is spending a lot of wealth in the name of wildlife security, whereas, other problems are more vital to priorities. I completely agree, because the basic needs and safety of humans are in danger and that should be the top focus of the government to find the solution.
Scarcity of drinking water for humans is a more important issue to address. This natural resource is only limited in content and every part of the world is drying and searching for an alternative to this problem, especially the poor nations are widely affected as their governments require funds to purify the contaminated water to the level of a safer zone for human consumption purpose. But unable to feed. For instance, recently in African continent Cape Town become the first city of the world which has now zero per cent drinkable water. Hence, the government should priorities such projects on top levels and the money should be allocated on such things to fulfil the basic needs of a human being.
In addition to that, global warming is another problem which is being faced all over the globe, therefore this problem should also be in the priority list for the state to find an instant solution. The rise in temperature of the environment is raising an alarm of danger for society. Drastic climate changes these days are making the situation worse. For instance, due to a rise in temperature, the polar ends are melting which will increase the sea level. As a result, the water above ground can cause serious destructions to the regions near the islands. Hence, the government should raise money on such projects on prime levels to eliminate these threats as early as possible.
In conclusion, although wildlife safety is vital for every nation to maintain the ecological balance, however, problems like global warming and lack of drinkable water require dire attention and money from the government to save human lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | abcde1 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | abcde1 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | abcd1234 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | bhatvishal@ | 78 | view |
- While recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to personal qualities rather than qualification and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 78
- These days many families move abroad for work. Some people believe that this benefits the children in these families. Others believe that it makes their lives more difficult.Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars. To what extent do you agree? 73
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed. While others believe action can be taken to bring about change. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Advertising is all around us, it is an unavoidable part of everyone's life, some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives while others say it is a negative one, Discuss both views and include your own opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90214067278 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55287032414 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547400611621 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7111983627 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123521391828 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422207222536 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448848483136 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837201180551 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227944304785 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.