You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph gives details about the amount of food a person consume per week in China during the time of 1985 to 2010.
Overall, Chinese had the tendency to eat more meat and salt while the consumption of salt tend to fall. It can easily be seen that the quantity of fish consumed were higher than either meat or salt.
During the first ten year of the period, the amount of fish eaten by people in China fluctuated. Started with 600 grams a person per week in 1985, this rose to 700 in the next five years then decline by 100 in half a decade. After that, they increase gradually to reach its peak at 850 grams in 2010. Meat also had the rise tendency like fish during this 25 years. In 1985, the consumption amount of meat stood at 100 grams, then steadily increased every year up to 200 gram in 2010.
Different from the others food, salt were the one that witnessed significant decline. In the 80s of the 20 centuries, Chinese ate a amount of salt which is 500 grams to be more specific. Later on, this figure dropped significantly to 200 in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Kien Vu | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | windingsilverfish | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-21 | emat18 | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | marykim7178 | 89 | view |
| 2018-08-23 | Dhruv_gre | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the process shown. 78
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010 78
- The diagrams show a structure that is used to generate electricity from wave power.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- It is better to save money than to spend it How far do you agree with this statement Is saving more important than spending in today s world Give reasons for your answer and provide ideas and examples from your own experience You should write at least 250 63
- The diagrams below give information about the Eiffel Tower in Paris and an outline project to extend it underground.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown.You should write at least 150 words. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...steadily increased every year up to 200 gram in 2010. Different from the others f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...200 gram in 2010. Different from the others food, salt were the one that witnessed ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he 80s of the 20 centuries, Chinese ate a amount of salt which is 500 grams to be...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37563451777 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.198854466 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58883248731 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.1007030551 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.3636363636 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12461039513 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485602582146 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334088165685 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815168437062 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360531644901 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.