A person should never make an important decision alone.
People have different views about whether it is beneficial to consult others in the process of making important life decisions or not. While some argue that it would be better to make critical decisions individually, I believe that an individual should trust other people's advice because they may not only have more experience but also have more expertise.
First, the more knowledge one possess, the better decision he can make. People who consult with others in their life have an outstanding opportunity of harnessing their's awareness. As a common practice, I consult my most critical decisions in life with my parents. Generally, people who are older than us have more experiences than us, though they may not be connoisseurs in our fields of expertise. My parents usually allude important points about the subject that otherwise remain covert. For example, once I was invited to a hiking event by a private student group. I was inclined to go with them at first because the inviter was one of my old friends. When I discussed the matter with my parents, they objected the issue asserting that they were encountered similar invitations while there were in college and later realized that the whole event was a hoax to adhere members for an illegal political movement. I surprised primarily, but later when I heard the group of people who participated that meeting declared their transformation to a political coterie, I surprised more. My parents were right about the inviter's intention since they had similar experience. Therefore, relying on others' experiences can shed light on invisible aspects of the subject, thereby aiding a person to make better decisions.
Additionally, today's world is so complex. The science has progressed so rapidly that nobody can posit that he knows every thing. If some one is an adroit physician, he will not necessarily know that much about engineering, and should some one be a psychologist, what he will know about sociology is very negligible. For these reasons, all of us require to utilize other people's expertise in our decisions. For instance, when two people tend to marry, this will not be sufficient for them to love each other. In today's world, there are a multitude of various points that must be considered by a pair to achieve connubial prosperity. Consulting a psychologist in this case not only does not contradict the two people's emotions, but also makes them confident on being successful in what may be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for them.
In conclusion, although some people may posit that a person should be self-reliant in making important decisions of his own life, I, personally, believe that consulting other people is more lucrative since they might have both more experience and more expertiase.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 66
- A tv station's business manager proposes to increase time of local news and weather news in late night news for some reasons. 82
- Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of our alpaca overcoat. Now that we have a new fabric supplier, we should resume production. This coat should sell ve 69
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erience but also have more expertise. First, the more knowledge one possess, t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1119, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'inviters'' or 'inviter's'?
Suggestion: inviters'; inviter's
...d more. My parents were right about the inviters intention since they had similar experi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a person to make better decisions. Additionally, todays world is so complex...
^^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...can posit that he knows every thing. If some one is an adroit physician, he will not nec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...that much about engineering, and should some one be a psychologist, what he will know ab...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'utilizing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: utilizing
...e. For these reasons, all of us require to utilize other peoples expertise in our decision...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2318.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10572687225 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90302687904 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52422907489 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2497952239 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.380952381 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.619047619 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162745738081 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474237451433 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058298707432 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129337960927 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631749943089 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.