Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
History offers us a plethora of individuals like Albert Einstein, Adolf Hitler, etc. who have left a lasting, exemplar legacy. Not without any detractors, these legends changed the course of history prodigiously and created a permanent place for themselves in the golden pages of history. Seeing their visions through regardless of the criticism and literal or metaphorical costs is what made them achieve the greatness we attribute to them today.
No doubt that having great ideas and visions in the field of interest is of paramount importance, but if the person lacks the dedication and determination requisite to see it through, however groundbreaking the vision is, it will never materialize.
Along with determination, patience is also a significant, defining characteristic of the people who have left legacies. Regardless of which field someone is working in - be it science, literature, politics it doesn't matter - criticism is an integral part of change. Mr. Einstein had numerous critics for his theory of relativity, the cricket team captain M. S. Dhoni faced a lot of backlash for his unorthodox ideas regarding team formation. Today we all know the profound effect Einstein's theory had on the way we understand the universe and how Dhoni's plans paved the way for the Indian cricket team to win the world cup in 2011.
These examples show how important it is to stick to your ideas and beliefs if you truly believe in them. However, Dhoni and Einstein did not succeed only because they were adamant. As much as being proactive helped them achieve greatness, not being sclerotic and being agile to changing circumstances also did. They wouldn't be the legends they are today if they stubbornly stuck to their ideas without evaluating the criticism.
Therefore it is clear that one needs to be determined toward the goal and evaluative towards criticism to leave a lasting legacy.
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 16
- The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones."In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway will run through 79
- The following was presented as part of a business plan by Apex Corporation."To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee, Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee, "Gourmet Select." Apex Corporation will first introduce the c 77
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 50
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... be it science, literature, politics it doesnt matter - criticism is an integral part ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...o changing circumstances also did. They wouldnt be the legends they are today if they s...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...as without evaluating the criticism. Therefore it is clear that one needs to be determ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17207792208 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87292611713 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633116883117 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6760170169 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.2 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190174139925 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566823464203 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576179909409 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103541407742 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457347416735 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.