Nowadays people can buy a large variety of household goods, more than ever before in most countries in the world. Is this a good or bad development? Give your opinion and examples.
These days people have an opportunity to buy a wide variety of goods for their houses as compared to the past. Mostly these goods help to complete daily chores conveniently and factories producing them boost the economy. Therefore, in my opinion, this is a positive development.
To begin, most household goods are home appliances, which are useful to do various household works, previously, these chores were done manually by ladies. As a result, household goods add convenience to our life and spare us time for our families. In Japan, for instance, people tend to own more household appliances and therefore, despite of busy routines, they can spend more time with families. In this way, owning more of these goods is a positive change.
Furthermore, like many other goods, household goods are also produced in factories. Higher use of household goods requires more production by factories; consequently, increasing the business for manufacturing plants and bringing growth to global economy. Positive growth in economy helps to generate more jobs. For example, China has the largest manufacturing industry of household goods and also more jobs for their huge population.
I believe it is a positive development to own a wide variety of goods, since these goods improve our living standards and play an important role in the economy. To further elaborate, take the example of developed countries, where people own more goods and also have bigger economies than developing countries.
In conclusion, buying more household goods is a positive development, which is changing people’s lives and helping countries to improve the economy.
- Some doctors think people are not getting enough exercise these days. Why is this? and what can be done about it? 73
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problems as a result.Why do many working people not get enough exercise?What can be done about this problem? 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Nowadays people can buy a large variety of household goods, more than ever before in most countries in the world. Is this a good or bad development? Give your opinion and examples. 56
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others Say that there are more important environmental problems.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35907335907 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91739659185 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563706563707 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4524384286 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1428571429 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284378441269 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104877926049 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380901671909 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168838805405 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200815519341 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.