While recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to personal qualities rather than qualification and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Recruitment processes are critical for any organization to hire right candidate for their working culture. It is argued by some individuals that recruiting officers should focus on personal attributes of the applying candidate instead of qualification and years of experience. I strongly disagree and believe that knowledge and years of work in the same field are critical essential to run the business smoothly.
Firstly, education makes the employee aware of the requirements in the organization to conduct business activities without hurdle. For instance, study in food microbiology educate the learner about the various requirements and compliance, which should be followed by an organization to comply government and non-government regulations, therefore hiring microbiologist in the food industry can directly benefits the company in terms of quality compliance and for those reasons the hiring authority should pay attention to educational qualifications.
Secondly, years of experience teaches an individual how to deal with different situations under pressure, therefore experience is an important aspect to be considered while hiring a candidate. The regular work on same thing calibrates an individual to become enough competent and strong candidate to make right decisions for the organizations. For that reason, only managers are paid high salaries as compared with inexperienced employees. Hence, recruitment steps should priorities experienced candidate on top of the hiring list.
In conclusion, however, personal qualities like good in sports can also benefits an organization in terms of social activities and gathering, it has little impacts on the business. Hence employers must focus on knowledge and years of work experiences while hiring a candidate rather than personal qualities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | Hai Bung Bia | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhatvishal@ | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | drtruong92 | 78 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, suchas the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import as little food as possible. 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 87
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- You play a team sport with some friends. Last week a member of the team had an accident and wasn't able to play with you at the weekend. You decide to write to him in hospital, telling him about the match.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed candidate on top of the hiring list. In conclusion, however, personal qualiti...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... it has little impacts on the business. Hence employers must focus on knowledge and y...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88636363636 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2555226088 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594696969697 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.4184515039 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.272727273 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148202573715 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568189984956 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580165623659 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928635700137 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392199475144 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.