In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Agricultural approaches have enhanced a lot during the recent decades. There are a myriad of people, nonetheless, facing a serious hunger. Imbalanced distribution of wealth and severe weather condition are some of the most important predicaments causing the situation.
Poverty and political issues result a stagnant economy which is not able to afford not only the cost of advances, but also the basic needs. As a result, the idea of using modern instruments and developed methods in agriculture seems to not be practical in such societies. Developed countries, in contrast, have the privilege of enjoying a powerful economy making them capable to afford the last farming facilities. If there was not a world of difference between these two types of society, there would be fewer people suffering hunger around the world.
Furthermore, being able to cause a huge catastrophe, a harsh weather condition has always been a major risk for farming lands. Natural events such as seasonal floods, thunderstorms and drought put society into serious troubles. In this condition, nutrient requirements must be provided by purchasing from other countries and going to great expense which make the situation worse.
International organizations such as UN can partly regulate the problem by offering financial and physical supports. Individuals and companies, moreover, can be in a partnership with such organizations as volunteers contributing to charitable works and agricultural projects. Also, if local farmers had more knowledge about modern farming methods, they would be more able to tackle with challenges. Hence, the guidance of an expert can lead to an improvement on their career.
Finally, it can be said that, in spite of all the progresses in agriculture, there are a multitude of people dealing with starvation. Although the gravity of the problem is undeniable, international organizations can pave it off by supporting local activities and making investments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | geforce | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | yasinyucesan | 95 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | choco_fans | 11 | view |
- Many people believe that it is better to learn something in a group rather than individually.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Nowadays people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organization.What might this be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 73
- Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste. Others think that industries are the ones causing pollution.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 96
- The maps below show the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The photo is in the next post 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1928 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... during the recent decades. There are a myriad of people, nonetheless, facing a seriou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, in contrast, such as, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50986842105 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14101677953 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634868421053 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8634365029 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.6875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176235048275 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463307102316 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514022276265 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835569499911 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499248025369 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.