It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
There is not gainsaying the fact that learning the difference between right and wrong at an early age has become essential for children’s growth and development. Although some people claim that punishment is an effective way to ensure them to do the right thing, I personally believe it is not necessarily a good method of teaching children good values, but teaching them effectively by making things clear to them would be an appropriate method.
To initiate with, how punishing can be prejudicial. Punishment might hurt a child’s feelings and thereby create negative impact on his heart and soul. Learners do not know any better; thus, grown-ups need to be more forgiving. For example, if children say inappropriate words, it would be better for progenitors or mentors to tell them it is not right to use those words and explaining can help them truly understand why that behavior is wrong. If a child does something wrong out of innocence, blindly grounding him or order him to stand in a corner would only make the child even more confused and plan the seed of hatred which is not healthy for his growth.
In addition to this, punishment is not as humane or effective as education is. Parents and teachers should set good examples for children to follow. Children do need proper guidance. Recent research shows that 80% of children who receive guidance and advice from their parents are often regarded as good students and behave in a good demeanor. In contrast, punished children are more likely to resent it and behave badly as a way to release the stress from punishment.
Despite such benefits, some proponents claim that punishment is something that every child has to be through on the way to become a good person. In fact, punishment should be based on reason. It has to be light, and not too harsh. And it must serve the purpose of education. To illustrate, a child breaking a glass should be asked to replace it. He or she should be encouraged to earn money to buy a new glass by helping their parents do the housework. This kind of punishment should be promoted as it is plausible while effectively sending the message that everyone must be responsible for all of their mistakes.
In conclusion, punishing children is not what parents and teachers ought to consider as an ut-most precedence. Guiding and making the positive message clear to them matters above all else. Parents and teachers had better inculcate good morals effectively in order to enrich their rectitude.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | eslamyousry | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | shihan99 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | kingdangyeu0606 | 22 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Mimibae 985 | 56 | view |
- Some people think that new technologies benefit the life of workers whereas some deny the statement. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 89
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous. Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree. 61
- People live longer today and so people should stay in the workforce longer. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and the government should encourage businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94103773585 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75476544284 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6910010731 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2272727273 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68181818182 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306048601685 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835057118094 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730698699547 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165206181427 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614816558302 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.