percentage change in house prices
The bar chart compares the alteration in cost average accommodation in new york, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt, London from 1990 to 2002 in comparison with 1989.
Overall, as can be seen, the house price in London had the most increase between 1996 and 2002, while there was a dramatic drop in Tokyo and London from 1990 to 1995.
In the 5 earliest years of the 1990s, the figure for the accommodation prices in Tokyo and London sharply fell by 7%. Meanwhile, the percentage change in new york had a moderate decline of about 5%. At the same time, 5 years observed a slight rise in house costs in 2 cities remained of just hovering from 2-3%.
In the next 5 years, the percentage modification surged of about 12% in accommodation cost in London corresponding with a steady drop in the capital city of Japan. By contrast, the house costs in Frankfurt, new york, and Madrid increased moderately by from 2 to 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
- some people say that history is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today's world, subjects like science and technology are more important than history.discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- some universities now offer their courses on the internet so that people can study online. is this a positive or negative development. 67
- in a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.discuss both vi 61
- the following two pie charts show the results of survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1995 and 1985 61
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups in 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 753.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67701863354 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71247292251 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.311470155 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203749943496 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912704441213 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578568659315 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11894418591 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863985340195 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.