The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities
Shown by the maps is the small island construction for tourism purposes. While the first map is the before, and the second one is the after development.
Overall, it is apperant that the major construction changes in the island are the accomodations and service units.
Looking at the first map, the small bare island which is around 250 metres long merely consists of sporadic palm trees in the west and east of the island, and beach having not allowed yet to swim.
Turning to the second map, accommodation areas are built in the island, in the west and east side of the island. Those accomodatios are surrounded by connected footpath, which could lead to the beach, located at the far west, where tourists could enjoy swimming. Moreover, in the centre of the accommodation areas, restaurant and reception building areconstructed. Those buildings are surrounded by vehicle track connecting to the pier in the south of island, where some boats sail and from which some tourists come and leave from the island.
- Some people think that they have right to use as much fresh water as they want. Others think government should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is limited source. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The diagram shows proposed changes to Foster Road 58
- Today the internet and TV have created chance for ordinary people to become famous. Is it a positive or negative development? 56
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05294117647 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71937810924 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241120598905 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104744731351 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584504278902 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142265396944 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461013670768 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.