The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.
The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Owning to the atomic energy in current era is a great blessing. However, it is generally argued that being equipped with atomic power has more pros as compared to cons. I tend to agree partially with this very notion.
Those who are of the view that being a nuclear state brings power balance, often support their argument by quoting that the fear of atomic war and its ultimate after-effects are limiting the chances of nuclear powers colliding against each other. For instance, on the latest conflict of Kashmir, India and Pakistan have restrained themselves from engaging in war just because both of them are nuclear powers and the impact could be devastating and global. Therefore, being an atomic power helps to decrease the power imbalance consequently maintaining the world-wide peace.
In addition to the previous point, atomic energy is also one of the cheapest energy resources benefiting many countries round the globe by directly complementing economic growth. Since energy requirements have been raised in all walks of life, nuclear technology not only fulfills the increased energy demands but it also helps the environment being one of the environment friendly and cost effective energy resource. Thus, there is no denying the fact that nuclear power can easily fulfill the energy need with least investment.
On the contrary, it also argued that the easy access and unrestricted use of atomic power could not be allowed to volatile nations because an irresponsible decision may lead to a global destruction. If this technology is permitted unsupervised the world might have to face horrible consequences because there are some countries which can be a potential hazard to global peace if handed atomic technology. Hence, use of atomic energy must be observed under strict laws.
To recapitulate, although the atomic power provides many perks but on the other hand it can jeopardize global peace if the technology is adopted by irresponsible nations without being observed by strict nuclear regulations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-12 | Misbah Nazir | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Misbah Nazir | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Misbah Nazir | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Misbah Nazir | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Misbah Nazir | 73 | view |
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads.Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use.To what e 73
- Students from disadvantaged families and rural areas are finding it difficult to get a university education.Some people believe that universities should help them. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'help'?
Suggestion: help
...lobal. Therefore, being an atomic power helps to decrease the power imbalance consequ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...ower can easily fulfill the energy need with least investment. On the contrary, it also ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28482972136 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77909264368 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569659442724 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9626431762 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.307692308 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163154297 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615738106273 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498724538697 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094330378817 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582258524955 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.