The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The bar chart provides information about the total amount of minutes that the British spent on telephone calls which distinguish into three types of calls between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, the local fixed-line is the most services spent in the UK experienced some fluctuations throughout the period, while the national and international fixed-line calls and mobile calls showed an upward trend from the beginning till 2002.
To be more precise, the total minutes of local fixed-line services was about 72 billion minutes in the initial period, being higher than the other two calls. Then, it hit the highest point of about 90 billion minutes in 1999. However, the figure showed a gradual decrease in the following year and continued to decline to the end of the period nearly 72 billion minutes.
On the other hand, the British spent about 38 billion minutes on national and international services in 1995, whereas the mobile calls were around one-fourth amount of earlier calls. However, the national and international calls experienced a moderate increase of almost 3 billion minutes per year, and it rose to about 61 billion minutes in 2002. Whereas mobile calls showed a slight growth by about 12 billion minutes in 1999, and the number had escalated significantly to nearly one half of the overall figure in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Nguyễn Thành Vinh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | morbymuku | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 78 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61880931026 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511520737327 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6479394387 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.5 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352437883405 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156269188641 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826962756665 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216627888835 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844330840394 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.