The envornment we are live in is in danger due to various problems. So what do you think should be responsible for solving it.Is the government,
organizations or individuals.
Recently, the impact of international travel and tourism in making people prejudiced has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what steps must be taken to challenge this issue?". Whereas it is a widely held view that tourism and international travelling have positive effects, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, travelling are bound up inextricably with different counties, which indicates they lead to both life experience and famous places. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between growing tourists and tourism industry as well as an exponential increase in revenue. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of cultural value is correlated positively with not only thinking way but also changing lifestyle.
Within the realm of tourism sector, without the slightest doubt, international travel attribute to travelling expenditure, in that it would come down to economic profit, development, and declining migration. A salient example of such attribution is foreign language, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take native speakers for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint tourism problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to creative thinking, agile mind, and even unlimited knowledge. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of travelling agency, tour leaders and government finance.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that several measurements must be implemented to solve this problem. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Amandeep Kaur sandhu | 80 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Amandeep Kaur sandhu | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Amandeep Kaur sandhu | 55 | view |
- Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon or curse for the society in general 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Should company top level authorities take employees’ suggestions while making any decisions? 11
- “In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 88
- Medical technology is responsible for the human s life expectancy To what extent do you agree or disagree Or Medical technology helps to live long life Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the social standpoint, travelling a...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g way but also changing lifestyle. Within the realm of tourism sector, with...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ur leaders and government finance. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87162162162 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13626348521 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695945945946 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.782159775 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.692307692 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0842659259022 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252501680595 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325490989845 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519100256283 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445082844923 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 55.0591133005 214% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.