The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
The pie charts illustrate comparison regarding how six different parts of world consume water for 3 different uses: industrial, agricultural and domestic use.
Overall, it is clear from the charts that the least popular way of utilizing water in the most parts of world is domestic purpose. Similarly, the areas of world where water is mostly consumed for industrial uses are developed continents like North America and Europe; however, in other comparatively less developed parts of earth, water is mostly utilized to satisfy agricultural needs.
Moving forward, being the areas of world utilizing water mostly for industrial consumptions, Europe and North America utilize nearly half of the total water consumption for manufacturing purpose while this method of consumption is least preferred by Central Asia, Africa and South America accounting for less than 10% of uses.
Meanwhile, agricultural use is the most popular way of using water resources in four of the areas of world. Among them, South America uses water slightly below third-quarter of total water uses; while, the three of the countries uses more than 75% of uses. Even among these three, the highest proportion (88% of total) of water uses is in Central Asia with regard to farming.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Fedkin | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Fedkin | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992. 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010. 67
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 100
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the usa since 1980 with projections until 2030. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, similarly, so, third, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.295 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73491773185 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8917058736 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.285714286 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385742227739 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191410999215 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786828541165 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246432727412 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600442246919 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.