which ability is more important to happiness. Having a long-lasting friendship with a few friends or making new friends with others easily ?
There is no doubt that friends in our daily life play an important part, which has a great relationship with our happiness. However, a debate comes which ability is more important to happiness, having a long-lasting friendship with a few friends or making new friends with others easily. As far as I'm concerned, the former ability has priority in term of making a great contribution to happiness.
Firstly, a friend after experiencing the test of time is more inclined to be a real friend, who really care about our feelings, pay attention to us and help us get out of trouble, thus our life will be inspired by their warmth and become happier. On many occasion, it is the pressure and failure occur in our daily life that make us get into depress. As the famous saying goes in China, a friend in need is a friend in deed. A real friend will not only try their best to hep us solve the problem that destroy our feelings, but also accompany and joke with us, which definitely bring happiness to us.
Secondly, the friends who have long-lasting friendships get a good command of mutual characters, which lay a solid foundation for the happy and free communication pattern. As the internet survey revealed, a free and comfortable communication pattern has great influence on the happiness. In this environment, we can speak out our thinking without hesitation and don't worry about whether what we say will lead to some bad effects. What is more important is that we can avoid a lot of conflicts and misunderstandings which bring from new friends, making our life happy.
Admittedly, the ability to make many friends easily can help us know more new things. However, the merit of it is not appealing enough compared with the happiness brought by the long-lasting friendships.
In conclusion, based on the reasons given above, therefore, I firmly insist that maintaining a friendship over a long time with a few people is more important than making new friends easily.
- whether the way of doing many things at the same time will make us lose the chance of achieving a good result. 71
- whether the way of doing many things at the same time will make us lose the chance of achieving a good result 66
- whether a job which can lead to a secure and successful future is more easier to identify in the past compared with nowadays. 80
- For young people, some people claim that they make great effort to devote sufficient time to assisting their communities. 66
- whether it should be advocated to award money to children when they get a high grade 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...w friends with others easily. As far as Im concerned, the former ability has prior...
^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun occasion seems to be countable; consider using: 'many occasions'.
Suggestion: many occasions
... by their warmth and become happier. On many occasion, it is the pressure and failure occur i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 363, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...out our thinking without hesitation and dont worry about whether what we say will le...
^^^^
Line 9, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom new friends, making our life happy. Admittedly, the ability to make many fri...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, no doubt, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86982248521 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85773088628 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532544378698 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5036114104 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.528685322785 0.236089414692 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190990856196 0.076458572812 250% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194909828821 0.0737576698707 264% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328538681625 0.150856017488 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169165243224 0.0645574589148 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.