Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
These days, universities are concerned by many students who want getting a high-quality education. Some people argue that universities need to focus on a professor’s salary if they desire to get the quality of education better. I strongly agree that the professor’s salary is considerable for improving education. This essay will provide further aspects and examples to support this idea in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, spending a large amount of money on salaries can attract high-quality professors. There are limited expert professors in this society, and because of their capacities, they have a high-paid. Consequently, signing any terrific professors is competitive, but it guarantees that they will improve the quality of education. To illustrate this, When I was a high school student, I studied in the specific class which is focusing more on a student’s English skill, known as the Intensive class. In this class, there were many subjects that were taught by English native speakers who were paid with high-salary to effectively improved student’s language skills. It is certainly clear to see why spending money on salaries can improve education.
Secondly, high-salary makes professors have a strong passion for teaching. People who get more salaries from their career tend to concentrate and have a strong discipline in their working quality because they need to conserve their quality for career stability. Therefore, spending high-salary will control teaching quality among the professors. I can attest this from my own experience, at my alma mater, there was a salary system that was used for controlling a teacher teaching quality. Teachers who did a splendid performance would acquire a bonus salary. Additionally, they would get a preferment that tended to earn more salaries. For this reason, high-salary will motivate professors to efficiently teach their students.
In conclusion, I obviously believe that spending money on a professor’s salary is essential to improve education’s quality. This is due to the fact that high-salary not only attracts the best professors to join the university’s staff, but it also enhances a professor’s passion for teaching their students.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A job with more vacation time but a low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation time Use specific reasons to support your answer 90
- Some people prefer to live in a small town Others prefer to live in a big city Which place would you prefer to live in Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take a risk rather than only doing what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Games are as important for adults as they are for children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6432748538 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3312307414 2.67179642975 125% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53216374269 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5273223912 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.578947368 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204253840813 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779316489224 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589796139351 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140769501861 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488478645161 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 10.9000537634 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.