The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which results from this energy.
The primary chart beneath exemplifies the way in which energy is utilized for domestic purposes in Australia, the second pie chart illustrates the emission of greenhouse gases from energy usage.
Overall, cooling is the smallest segment of household energy, whereas heating is the most significant part of this. On the contrary, water heating contributes the most to greenhouse gas emissions.
First of all, the most striking feature of the graph is that, slightly over two-fifth of energy is used for heating purposes, whereas the greenhouse gas emission through this is 15%, which is almost one-third. Following this, the greenhouse gas emission due to water heating is 32%, which is slightly over the usage of 30%. The least amount of energy is used for cooling and lighting that amounts to 2% and 4%. Although, the greenhouse gas emission through this usage is about double resulting in 3% and 8% respectively.
Moreover, 7% of energy is utilized for refrigeration, while 14% has resulted in greenhouse gas emission, that is just a double. Furthermore, the greenhouse gas emission due to other appliances are approximately over a quarter (28%) ; however, the energy usage for this is slightly under a fifth (15%).
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-09 | Naman Kumar Singh | 73 | view |
2019-10-27 | Naman Kumar Singh | 67 | view |
2018-02-25 | Turonxoja | 61 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which results from this energy. 73
- The chart below shows the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to England in 2000 and 2010. 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Othersbelieve that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and gi 89
- Many children these days have their own mobile phones.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, third, whereas, while, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23350253807 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87125098807 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6453156736 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333057996101 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141518286267 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606356718414 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198827027803 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642082912204 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.