International travel is becoming cheaper, and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages
The international tourism industry has increased dramatically due to the fact that countries are more open to tourists. Accompanying such a trend is a package of several advantages and disadvantages. In my point of view, the latter is not outweigh but rather both are balanced each other.
To begin with, there are detrimental effects brought by the industry of mass tourism. The first to name in the list is the impact on the environment. Emerged resorts and hotels or other types of tourist attraction destroyed the local natural habitat. For example, in Vietnam, resorts have been illegally constructed opposite to the beach in order to welcome more tourists with its beautiful views. this blocks the wind flow from the sea to the land, therefore, make it hotter than before. Furthermore, the living costs also rose as the effect of the flock of tourists. Pressure is put on local presidents especially for those who have low income. For instance, in Cambodia, the cost of street food is relatively high for people with low income.
On the other hand, mass tourism is a tremendous source of income for the nation in general. When tourists arrives, they spend money for accommodations, services or entertainment which is the substantial revenues. The example of this is the illustration of the amount of expenditure of travelers in Dubai. The city become more and more prosperity because of the climb in the number of foreign visitors. And such revenues not only benefit the local business but also profit the government in form of taxation. Moreover, employment rate will increase because of the huge demanding in occupations such as hotel or resort staffs, tour guides or chefs which will solve the problem of job’s shortage.
In conclusion, for all the reasons mentioned above, I deem that the advantages and disadvantages of the issue are balanced themselves. it also can be predicted that, mass tourism will still be increased.
- In many parts of the world people search for family history Some people think that finding for the previous generations is a thing to do but others think that it is better to be focus on present and future generations Discuss both views and show your opin 76
- The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009 Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport Summarise the information by selecting and report 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050. 73
- In many countries, the costs of living are rising. What are the effects on individuals and society? Suggest solutions to this problem 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
... In my point of view, the latter is not outweigh but rather both are balanced each other...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...more tourists with its beautiful views. this blocks the wind flow from the sea to th...
^^^^
Line 13, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...s of the issue are balanced themselves. it also can be predicted that, mass touris...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.109375 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88752536515 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603125 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.558993082 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.0526315789 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52631578947 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206637668949 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545860143452 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890304783121 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129920875932 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877676222654 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.