Some people think that there should be some strict controls about the noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both these views and give your opinions
Moving towards the 21st century, many people are nowadays expressing a deeply growing concern about the problem of noise pollution that is currently increasing in modern society. In fact, there are some who hold firmly to their belief that people should have the right to produce noise if they want to. However, others argue convincingly that the level of noise being created should be strictly controlled. Therefore, some arguments both for and against this issue will be addressed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, there are two main points for people to defend the former argument that governments should make laws to control the amount of noise produced. It is a well-documented fact that too much noise can significantly affect people’s health. The most obvious example to prove is that living in a place that is too noisy, due to problems of mental and physical health, such as headache, stress. Furthermore, there is no doubt that noise can disturb people’s work or study, so the productivity of work may be reducing. For instance, a university student will not be able to concentrate on his preparation for exams if his neighbors keep singing too loud.
On the other hand, there are two primary pieces of evidence for people to support the latter argument that people can make as much noise as they want because of the reasons. First and foremost, it is commonly accepted that people often consider noise as a part of the industrialization and modernization process, therefore people have found ways to deal with the problem of noise pollution. A clear example to prove is that scientists have invented walls and windows that can block out the noise, which allows individuals to focus on their work without being disturbed. Equally important, there is no denying that producing noise is sometimes considered a type of recreational activity. This is supported by the fact that singing or cheering for a football club can be relaxing, and everyone has the right to do those things. As a result, they feel that there are no particular reasons to control noise.
All things are considered, it is my strong belief that noise should be limited in order to have a better life. Accordingly, I strongly recommend the governments should enhance people’s awareness in terms of controlling noise in their life, it is a respect for the community. If this recommendation is carried out, the comprehensive development of our future generations will be ensured
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | wardiati | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | ramenkimchi | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | lexuanthai93 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | lexuanthai93 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | lexuanthai93 | 73 | view |
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using the Internet in our daily activities. 73
- Deforestation caused by human activity is happening in many parts of the world with serious results for the environment What are the main causes and effects of deforestation 78
- Computers play a vital role in education. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using computers in education 73
- Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of using to the Internet in our activities 84
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
... on their work without being disturbed. Equally important, there is no denying that pro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, in fact, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06097560976 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91312237556 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543902439024 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.136594128 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.277777778 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270718272034 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868517730024 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625137736526 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170072436387 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695331230443 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.