Government should invest in country art, music and painting. Agree and disagree.
<span style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87); font-family: Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: normal;">It has long been subject of discussion whether professional workers such as doctors, nurses and teachers should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention and I will elaborate it by using pertinent argruments. There are myriad of arguments in favour of my context, the most conspicuous one lies in that doctors, nurses and teachers plays a vital role in the society by providing their services. They contribute towards human life directly or indirectly. Moreover, in order to reach this position, they do </span><span class="grammar-error" style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87); font-family: Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: normal;">a lot of struggle</span><span style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87); font-family: Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: normal;"> and spend most of their time in serving the society. So, it is important that they must be well paid. Hence, government should pay them as per their contribution to the community. Another argument in favour of my view is that sports and entertainment personalities also plays a crucial role for the name of the country. Good players, are representative of the country in the world for their contribution in sports. </span><span class="grammar-error" style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87); font-family: Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: normal;">While</span><span style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.87); font-family: Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: normal;">, entertainment personalities spend more of their time in those activites which are useful to entertain the masses. Thus, all must be paid according to their efforts for nation. From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that professionals, sports and entertainment personalities are great servers of the community as a whole. Lastly, in my opinion, it is better to pay all of them as per their contribution and efforts and there will be no discrimation on the account of pay.</span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-13 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2024-05-17 | Phatle20010807 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-24 | m.shoorangiz | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | Amna Zeeshan | 78 | view |
- work life balance difficulty ,problems and importance of work life balance. 73
- Nowadays it is increasingly more difficult to maintain the right balancebetween work and other aspects of one s life such as leisure time with familymembers How important do you think is this balance Why do people find ithard to achieve 21
- Universities should provide training than practical knowledge 56
- difficulties in work life balance, problems and importance. 56
- work life balance difficulty ,problems and importance of work life balance. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 940, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun struggle seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of struggles'.
Suggestion: a lot of struggles
...-size: 14px; white-space: normal;'>a lot of struggle ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.41614906832 5.12529762239 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.90348970197 2.80592935109 175% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487577639752 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 161.135036538 49.4020404114 326% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 172.166666667 106.682146367 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0209209790543 0.244688304435 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0137495030035 0.084324248473 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347858924762 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0209209790543 0.151304729494 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.0946893788 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.25 12.4159519038 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.