In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food from other regions more than local food. As a result, much of the food has to come from other regions. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages?
It is true that people usually are prone to choose to eat foreign food instead of local food. While I understand that there are several disadvantages of this trend, I strongly believe that the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks.
One of the many drawbacks is that eating imported food might have a negative impact on the environment. This trend will raise the demand for transportation, such as flights and sea transportation because foreign food relies on these transportations to export food. Frequency transportation will increase the amount of greenhouse gas, which leads to exacerbate global warming and raise sea levels. As a result, some coastal places or countries with low altitude might disappear and the citizens in these places might be homeless.
On the other hand, there are some benefits to the consumption of imported food. One of the many advantages is that this trend improves the trades between different regions. Countries will plant better quality of agricultural products in order to boost the number of these products that other regions purchase. For example, Japanese farmers develop new varieties of apples every year, so the Japanese government can increase the revenue from these apples exported. As a result, it will raise the income of a whole nation. Another key benefit is, greater job opportunities can be anticipated. With the booming development of imported food, the quantity of transportation will soar as well. In order to meet these needs of transportation, delivery businesses need to expand the number of employees.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the possible merits of this trend, in terms of improvements of trades between different regions and greater job opportunities, prevail over the downsides, such as a negative impact on the environment. Therefore, I recommend that the government should encourage more people to choose imported food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | rookiewriter | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- In some countries governments pay the money for students' university fees，while in other countries, students pay for themselves. Do advantages of governments paying for the students outweigh its disadvantages? 78
- In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food from other regions more than local food. As a result, much of the food has to come from other regions. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages? 56
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33222591362 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01362417415 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531561461794 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8285189793 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293902190107 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905067159226 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736120267331 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179232071997 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541774837548 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.