The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000
The given bar chart illustrates the highest and lowest amount on average of distinct contaminants in the air on a daily basis of 4 different cities in 2000.
Overall, Mexico City always had larger amount of air contaminants compared to other 3 metropolises while the last place belonged to Los Angeles and Beijing in terms of SO2 and N2O, respectively.
The amount of SO2 in Calcutta fluctuated between 47 and 59 on average everyday while the figure for Beijing witnessed a higher gap of 75 with highest level stood at 100, almost doubled that of Calcutta. In addition, the N2O concentrations in atmosphere of Beijing and Calcutta were equal at around 50 as highest amount while the minimum number of Beijing was at 14, just a half of Calcutta’s data.
The figures for Mexico City was always highest amongst four places with highest statistics doubling lowest ones, 200 and 80 in term of SO2 and 207 and 113 presenting N2O, respectively. On the other hand, Los Angeles has considerably small levels of SO2 being at only 2 micrograms per m3 as least and 10 as maximum level. While the lowest N2O level was at 39, the highest one of Los Angeles stood at 104 and just being equal to smallest amount of the figure for Beijing.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-08 | Mekata | view | |
2022-08-01 | nhinhi999 | 67 | view |
2021-10-13 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
2021-03-07 | Viru Patel | 100 | view |
2019-12-26 | hungprok | 67 | view |
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages? 89
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000 67
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000 67
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life. Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future. 84
- The graph and chart below give information about the number of new graduates and their employment in the UK from 1992 to 2002 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...or Beijing witnessed a higher gap of 75 with highest level stood at 100, almost doubled that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'amount' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'amounts'.
Suggestion: amounts
...utta were equal at around 50 as highest amount while the minimum number of Beijing was...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
... was always highest amongst four places with highest statistics doubling lowest ones, 200 an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 425, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the smallest'.
Suggestion: to the smallest
...geles stood at 104 and just being equal to smallest amount of the figure for Beijing.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71296296296 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73832710914 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.1566520598 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 145.428571429 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8571428571 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16667081872 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902786139694 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889093141073 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126012788666 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990843658912 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.