Advantages and disadvantages of team or group working in an organization.
In the set of material, in reading section writer mentions about benefits of organization working on particular project. Professor also describes the advantages of team working in organization. However, in listening section, professor provides some argument against the reading section.
Firstly, in reading passage professor state the team member has wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skill than any single person work on a particular project. A team can response more quickly to any task of project and they can find more creative solution to problems and any issue in project. Sometime these creative solutions fails, but in that case any single person is not responsible for that failure because the risk is taken whole team. But instead of that in listening section professor gives the example of a particular organization, in that organization a team are divided for a new project. After six month company observed the performance of each team. They found that the team is performing very well but some people's in a team are free ride. They cannot contribute their effort in a group working.
Secondly, in reading passage professor state that the group process is very rewarding for the team member. They have a better chance to shine in an organization to a single person. But in lecture professor oppose the writing and state it has more chance to shine when one or two person working on a single project. Also they have a less influence in their working on a single project, they has a less confusion taking any decision on a possible solution on problems occurs in project.
In conclusion, the reading passage provide advantages of team or group working in organization, instated of that in lecture professor mention the disadvantages of team working. Some people's think that the group working is better; other think the individual working is more suitable when working in an organization on a particular project.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | sefeliz | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | YasamanEsml | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | 宋致遠 | view | |
| 2023-06-14 | Simin_MB | 65 | view |
- Imagine that you have received some land to use as you wish. how would you use this land. Use specific details to explain your answer. 60
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change. Use reason and specific examples to support your answer. 61
- Some people like doing work by hand. others prefer using machines. which do you prefer 61
- A company has announced that it wish to build a large factory near your community. discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. do you support or oppose the factory. explain your position. 60
- You have enough money to purchase either house or business which you choose to buy 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the set of material, in reading secti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...argument against the reading section. Firstly, in reading passage professor st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n a team are divided for a new project. After six month company observed the performa...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bute their effort in a group working. Secondly, in reading passage professor s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...as more chance to shine when one or two person working on a single project. Also they ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...two person working on a single project. Also they have a less influence in their wor...
^^^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...their working on a single project, they has a less confusion taking any decision on...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nization on a particular project.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.01324503311 339% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13880126183 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80258302887 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441640378549 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0156219494 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8125 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34057238099 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126978704023 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129949411506 0.0662205650399 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251306603661 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158347702259 0.0443174109184 357% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.