some students choose university near at home
The importance of some students choose university near at home which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former propositions
appears
to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion. There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that some students further study in universities and other students choose university away from family. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that some students choose university near where they live and continue to stay at home. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead. However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can
certainly
overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that they should students choose university near at home because students time is saving for study. Besides, it is one of the
disadvantage is university at home. Some students unaware for the daily routine. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend. According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of they can students choose university near where they live and continue to stay at home with families are instrumental
indeed.
Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-29 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-04-15 | Kanika Aggarwal | 80 | view |
| 2020-03-15 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-02-27 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In my opinion, the former propositions appears to be more rational. This ess...
^^^^
Line 5, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
..., the former propositions appears to be more rational. This essay will furth...
^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential inf...
^^^^
Line 9, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overwhelm
...arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Disadvantage
... for study. Besides, it is one of the disadvantage is university at home. Some students un...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y at home with families are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential d...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Indeed
... home with families are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbac...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: indeed,
... home with families are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbac...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27819548872 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71893931775 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522556390977 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.6417122959 50.4703680194 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494450825201 0.242375264174 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17881792733 0.0925447433944 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181100309007 0.071462118173 253% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281955313501 0.151781067708 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149502301467 0.0609392437508 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.