The government want to improve education levels. Which of the following do you think is the best way?
1. hire more teachers to teach in a small class
2. preschool education before kindergarten
3. to provide some training courses so that teachers can be more professional
Nowadays, the government tries to improve the education of the level in order to educate intelligence for children. A large number of ways for developing of education level proposed in which the best method of this approach is providing some modules for a teacher to be on the professional level.
From the critic’s aspect of the most important skill for a teacher is having good communication skills to transfer high-quality information to the student. It seems that many teachers have a problem to express their idea and communicating with the student. However, focusing on the age of children is so important to solve in this kind of problem. Japan, for example, teachers before starting the educational year have to prepare for a new range of psychological plans for understanding student’s altitude by considering their age. As a result, warm relationships between students and teachers can be achieved by on course belong their characteristics.
Some modules in the academic institution need a complementary course that needs the teacher to attend this kind of course. In the experimental courses, a shortage of practical units is needed to learn by the teacher. Besides, it can be an extra course for the student who hasn’t been successful in their education. For Instance, in the middle east university more authorizes pose student and teacher to pass practical courses for student and teacher. To sum up, having and passing practical courses simultaneously vital before and after starting educational courses.
Managing time has been a vital factor of a professional teacher who is trained by the university. A wide range of teachers should have dominated the time for ending courses before every semester. Although, with a proportion of course volume and the number of units it will determine with the manager of the educational system. So, it has been important to the teacher which kind of unit is needed more time. Due to, having a good level of the educational system, in the united states approximately 20% of annual budgets of the government allocate for planning for managing the time. As a result, the third factor developing the educational system is managing time.
In conclusion,3 crucial factors for developing educational system is discussed which have needed important plan by governmental authorizes. It will be assumed that these issues will have solved by participating teachers and managers of university and academic institutions in the next decades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | amir_gha67 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantage of being self employed 70
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Modern cultures around the world have become similar as compared to the past What are the main reasons for it Is it a positive or negative development 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends? 60
- Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...r to educate intelligence for children. A large number of ways for developing of education level ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, so, third, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, of course, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31909547739 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12806401391 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474874371859 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2869555703 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.85 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260428054803 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933292210337 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448438313469 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163463533527 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499373229185 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.