Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, education of children engendered copious controversies among people. Some people may hold the view that parents today are more involved in children’s study. However, some others may take the opposite viewpoint and believe that parents effected study of the children more than today. In my point of view, due to knowledge of people and emerging new technologies, parents today are more concerned about children’s education.
First, human today are more knowledgeable from human of the past. Nowadays, the knowledge of human race are rapidly increasing and because of that, they have more information. For instance, in the past in was not necessary to get a university degree for finding a job. These days, all the jobs need special skill and without them, getting hired in a company is impossible. Therefore, finding a job in these day need a set of skills that without academic education, there are no other way to learn them. Parents play an important role in children’s education to help them to have a better life and great career in the future.
Second, with emerging new technologies, tendency of children decreases through last decades. In the past, children played with their friends all the time in street and after a while they became tired and do their studies. But, today children are more inclined toward new technology like game consuls and video games. The kind of hobby makes children addictive to this kind of game. Furthermore, they cannot think about something instead of this game. For example, when my brother was younger, we have play station. I spend my time on it for one hour a day. But my little brother got addicted to this device and instead of study his book and homework, he played it for a long time. My parents which were not happy about his behavior, told him they will let him play when he finished his assignments.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, since the knowledge of the parents increase in last years and new technologies have a destructive effect on children’s study, parents are more concerned from the past. In fact, there are myriad of other reasons, challenging the above statement, which could be mentioned but are not embrace due to the dearth of time.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 65
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- tpo 33 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'these days'?
Suggestion: this day; these days
...impossible. Therefore, finding a job in these day need a set of skills that without acade...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...nd of hobby makes children addictive to these kind of game. Furthermore, they cannot think...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0025974026 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81031759276 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.570478415 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7142857143 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343046404284 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911938798778 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938843659414 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20788243558 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948148564963 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.