Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
It is undoubtedly that new technological gadgets have influences on communication between modern society. Technology has changed relationships in various ways, and in my perspective, it has both beneficial and harmful effects on users.
There are two ways that social media platforms have impacts on people’s live. In the first place, hand-writing letters have replaced by emails or messages through telephones. Unlike the grandparents’ time, people use letter writing to confess their love to partners, younger generations use messages with a variety of emotional emojis to express their feelings, emotions or send prompt greetings or congratulations of life events instead of waiting for a long time. Secondly, users today use high technologies mainly on work and study to save time. If in the past, the office staffs or students had to go to the companies or schools to attend face-to-face conversations, then at the present, they can stay home, discuss or even study via social media networks such as Facebook, Twitter or online study courses.
Because of these developments, it has both good point and bad one. On the one hand, using technologies on communications is cost-effective and time-consuming. Facebook is a prime example in this situation, users can send thousands messages in a few seconds and access to this platform everyday to acknowledge the latest news. On the other hand, they can result in a decline in people’s basic ability to socialize and interact with each other on a day-to-day basis. The conducted survey in one university in Vietnam (2015) pointed out that nearly 89.9 percent students use smartphones in meetings for chatting and playing online games instead of sharing, discussing or making new friends with each other.
In conclusion, people’s relationships have developed by technologies in two mentioned ways and they document both positive and negative impacts on users.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | NgocNhi | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | cocococo123 | 78 | view |
- Recent research shows that the consumption of junk food is a major factor in poor diet and this is detrimental to health. Some people believe that better health education is the answer to this problem but others disagree. What is your opinion? 84
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life,but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 84
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is undoubtedly that new technological...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eficial and harmful effects on users. There are two ways that social media pla...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ook, Twitter or online study courses. Because of these developments, it has bo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...few seconds and access to this platform everyday to acknowledge the latest news. On the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r making new friends with each other. In conclusion, people's relationshi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, such as, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41860465116 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23165489151 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617940199336 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3361075241 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.461538462 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228496228564 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755321975288 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752011922161 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150326689306 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791781755423 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.