In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
These days, technological advancements brought us agricultural prosperity, but many in the world still suffer from starvation. While I believe that there are certain reasons for this situation, various measures can be taken to solve the problem.
It is quite obvious why many people around the world are still hungry. One reason would be that those advances made in agriculture are mainly focused on a few countries. For instance, United State, one of the most developed nation, have the latest technologies, such as genetically modified crops or heavy machines as well as blessed fertile lands. Whereas countries in Africa still harvest with bare hands and livestock on the very dry land where crops are hardly grown. In addition, countries in the abundance of food often neglect and be negative to help those poor countries because there are no benefits for them. Another meaning is that unless the country suffering from starvation has something worth to trade, such as oil, natural resources or specialties, it will be hard to expect any assistance from wealthy countries.
However, there are various solutions we can try. First, we can just leave them to die even if it sounds obviously cruel and against humanity. However, consider the natural selection; weak species naturally die out which is a key mechanism for the prosperity of the rest of lives, and I believe that this could be the case to apply. Second, we can support hungry people by dragging global support. To do that, we can emotionally appeal to leaders and public opinion of rich countries that how painful to be hungry while food waste is the main issue for some countries. Finally, technological support can be provided to those poor countries, so that they will be self-sufficient in producing food.
In conclusion, it is too shameful that there are still many people suffering from hunger. although there are main causes of this problem, I believe that we can still solve it by either to ignore the matter or help them by taking the actions mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-15 | nbaochi14 | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | gunju3305 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | Mohsensnake | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | Mohsensnake | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | jaseya | 73 | view |
- In many countries, as people are earning more these days they are also spending money in buying more and more items. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 78
- The amount of drinkable water for people is decreasing Why is this What can be done 52
- These days many children spend a lot of their time playing computer games but little time doing sports Why is this Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your own o 84
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by fast food This has a negative impact on families individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...till many people suffering from hunger. although there are main causes of this problem, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, still, well, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02359882006 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68501402267 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589970501475 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2329360413 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.4375 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289127586649 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939843429499 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701207663942 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18288444268 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436068329017 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.