Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Raising the required driving age is reportedly believed to be the most efficient means of reducing traffic accidents. While this policy may have advantages to some extent, there are numerous much better measures should be considered
On the one hand, the positive effects of raising the legal age for driving a car or motorbike should not be underestimated. First and foremost, there is plenty of road incidents resulted from youngster's carelessness. It seems to be shreds of evidence that young people are driving more aggressively and often less responsible with their manners when compares with the mature ones. Therefore, it is reasonable to limit the driving age that can make sure they are mature enough to join traffic on their own without posing threats to others. Another reason is that the older driver may handle emergencies better. It is undoubtedly true that driving required alertness and high concentration since a small mistake can lead to terrible traffic pile-up. The senior people, who are more experienced, are controlling the transport more seriously and deal with difficult situations on the road better properly, whereas the youngster might not
Nevertheless, there are long-term actions to be taken to ensure road traffic safety. First of all, the government should investigate more budget in traffic infrastructure. Updating the main route throughout the country is synonymous with creating a better driving condition for the driver to encounter the unfortunate accident. Furthermore, improving the public transportation system can be a good way to encourage people to use mass transit. Besides the purpose of diminishing traffic congestion, public transports may also provide the youngster a means of transport until they get their own private vehicle or motorbike. In the second place, stricter punishment should be enacted as a deterrent to the driving offenders. Heavy fines, forfeiting the driving license or even long-time imprisonment can be a good can in point.
To sum up, since the youngster seems irresponsible for their driving and often drive aggressively, raising the legal driving age can be quite effective in short-term. Ensuring road safety requires long-term solutions such as improving traffic infrastructure or enforcing severer traffic legislation
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | emzin | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
- Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic social and commercial perspectives What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures 73
- Parents often give children everything they ask for and do what they like Is it good for children What are the consequences when they grow up 84
- Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Others however believe that girls and boys benefit more from attending mixed schools Which education system do you think is better Why 11
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world What are the reasons for this and suggest some solutions 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, in short, such as, first of all, to sum up, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50847457627 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01421827778 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564971751412 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3618250719 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.875 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174683351319 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556026127885 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480742810986 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117044181856 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035958633816 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.