The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The charts give information about the amount of money a UK school using for different purposed each year in 1981, 1991, and 2001.
Overall, the percentage of insurance experienced an increase every 10 years while yje figure for other workers' salaries showed an opposite trend. Despite variations over the period of time, teachers' salaries still maintained the leading position.
In 1981, teachers' salaries accounted for the highest proportion, at 40%, followed by 28% of other workers' salaries. While the expenditure rate of furniture and equipment, as well as, studying materials was equal, staanding at 15% each, insurance was responsible for trivial proportion, only 2%. After a decade, the spending on teachers' salaries and resources climbed to 50% and 20% respectively. In comparison, the percentage of insurance also increased slightly to 3%, yet the rest 2 categories showed a decline by 6% for other wrkers' salaries and 10% for infrastructure.
In 2001, teachers' salaries still occupied the highest proportion of the total school spending, at 45% whose figure doubling that of furniture and equipment (23%). In contrast, the percentage of salaries of other workersand resources decreased by 7% and 11% in order, insurance was seen a significant rise from 3% to 8%.
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002
- the chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...site trend. Despite variations over the period of time, teachers salaries still maintained the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ng that of furniture and equipment 23%. In contrast, the percentage of salaries of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36815920398 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96989506983 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616915422886 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6101941601 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.888888889 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111546567171 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505695593436 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718168213503 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900567052718 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089392891563 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.