The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern day, an opinion of increasing the charge of fuel is a top priority to combat with the global contamination. Given that this measure is effective to deal with environmental issues, there are numerous methods, which seem to be feasible.
It is undeniable that a higher fee of fuel is necessary. Firstly, due to a higher tax on fuel, it may act as a barrier to discourage urban citizens utilizing their private vehicles. As a result, a considerable amount of exhaust fumes which releases into the atmosphere would decline significantly. Secondly, a higher cost of fuel would take a step to force citizens from carrying out a green life. This is because these citizens have a greater sense of saving such daily activities household as lighting, heating, and commuting as well as applying more environmentally friendly technologies.
There is a wide range of measures, which brings about broad-based benefits. Firstly, governments are able to allocate their budgets to invest in such public transportation as railways and subways. By encouraging urban citizens making use of public vehicles on a daily basis, it does not only reduce an emission into the air but also leads to declining congestion. Secondly, governments in extinct continents are more likely to associate with each other to hold numerous activities and workshops. For example, there is an annual global activity as ‘The earth hour’, which fosters the movement of saving energy around the world.
In conclusion, an increasing in the cost of fuel seems to be an effective measure, however, there is a wide range of feasible method that are able to combine with
the former methods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas Do you think it is negative or positive development 89
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Encouraging people to use public transport is the best way to solve traffic problems in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12867647059 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.978510748 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584558823529 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0457896737 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0882458574021 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031326238688 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334875224241 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062738008614 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370117452738 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.