Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers
The author stated that educational institutions should actively encourage students to select fields of study that will prepare them for profitable careers. Many of us will argue that this will hold all the time, while others will counter this. In my essay, I will highlight negative the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
Educational institutions play a major role in shaping the career of its students. The more successful students are in their career the better the growth opportunities and a great future which in turn proves out to be useful for the society, the country they are residing in one way or another. Hence, it is a prime role of the educational institutions to guide the students on choosing a perfect field of study.
Now the question is whether the education institutions actively encourage their students to choose those fields that have a lucrative career or they should not encourage them. The answer to the question is No because this will affect the interests of the students. By doing this institutes will dissuade the student from pursuing a career of their choice, a choice which they living from the last few years. Another reason for disagreement is that the continuous availability of these so-called lucrative jobs or careers in particular fields of study is not certain. What if till the time the students complete their degree the demand on that particular field in which they graduate decreased exponentially. Then, this will be deleterious for the student and also the main agenda of the institutes will fail.
However, there is another question that is what if a student has no idea about what he wants to do in life or which subjects should he choose. In this case instead of encouraging the student to take the fields with a good career, what institute can do is that they should counsel them and help them in finding what will be good for them and their career. I think this would be very beneficial for those students who are clueless about their future.
In nutshell, we can say that choosing a field that has a lucrative career is not a bad idea, but these fields should not impose on the student if they have some other plans or interests. Instead of imposing, the best option will counsel them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | wopona8219 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | wopona8219 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | TiOluwani97 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | PranaviN | 50 | view |
| 2023-05-25 | shashank__hegde | 33 | view |
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town Adams Realty and Fitch Realty Adams Realty is clearly superior Adams has 40 real estate agents in contrast Fitch has 25 many of whom work only part time Moreover Adams revenue last year was twice as high as 78
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 66
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable 50
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 66
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 207, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: Now
...age them. The answer to the question is No because this will affect the interests ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, while, i think, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83418367347 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59779440417 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474489795918 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9929636944 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.470588235 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0588235294 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.610451177912 0.243740707755 250% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199783397816 0.0831039109588 240% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153382882109 0.0758088955206 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343136314598 0.150359130593 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912859498403 0.0667264976115 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.