The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate the number of noticeable changes after a hydroelectric dam was constructed in a town.
Overall, because of the appearance of the new power dam, the area of the forest and the farmland had completely disappeared only in a span of 20 years.
In 1990, there was an ancient structure and a forest with rare flora and species located at the west of the river, and in the east area, there was a village and irrigated farmlands. However, with the construction of the hydroelectric power dam, those features disappeared and gave a place for electric towers on both sides of the river except the villages.
Looking at the maps for more details, a new lake and a large hotel were built in the far east from the river in 2010. To build the new lake, the river flow was interrupted by mountains. A huge hotel was constructed next to the fishing lake for commercial purposes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-29 | haphuongpham49 | 81 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 61
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced Summarize the important information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cell phone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 741.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71974522293 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76991715989 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566878980892 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5854173813 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149570726932 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762246677127 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883021111869 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111257302614 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882110788398 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.