Nowadays, entertainers get paid more than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is this a negative or positive development?
It is common in today’s society that people who work in the entertainment industry are more profitable in comparison with politicians. In my opinion, this development is mostly associated with positive impacts on modern life.
There are myriads reasons why entertainers make more money than political people. The main reason is that almost people everyone now lives in a capitalistic world, where the more productive you are, the more rewards you get. Regarding this issue, it is clear that the former does it better than the latter. Entertainers present in any advertiser of any product can contribute to increasing the revenue. Their profits that they bring to sales are worth getting a value paid. Besides, people now concern more in entertainment than in politics so that it results in an upward trend of the average amount on investing in the entertainment industry. I mean that entertainers have a chance to earn more money.
Maybe it has many opinions on this issue but I personally believe that it would be preferable development in general as below. Firstly, entertainment is the way people can release stress. This is to say investing in this industry also makes the quality of moral life better. Secondly, no one can deny that corruption appears in the political field. It leads to criticism in society. Thus, reducing the average salary of politicians to calm public opinion is the reasonable way of some governments in many nations.
In conclusion, it has become more popular, it has brought too many problems for this to be considered a positive trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-12 | n0air9x9 | 89 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | haphuongpham49 | 82 | view |
- The pie charts provided illustrate two major changes in the use of modes of transport to a certain university between 2004 and 2009 90
- The given diagram gives information about the process of getting a driving license 78
- The line graph below shows the cases of diseases caused by the X virus in Australia from 1960 to 1995 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 73
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, i mean, in conclusion, in general, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88621494113 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592307692308 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5894559526 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381432846866 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102164084221 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595958484199 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205711959365 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422369831041 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.