Some people believe famous people support towards international aid organizations draws attention to problems. Others think celebrities make the problems less important.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent decades, public figures’ involvement in international aid organizations has been causing some public controversy. Although some people suppose that this trend will take away public attention from the problem, I believe those problems will be put on priority thanks to celebrities’ support.
On the one hand, famous people’s participation might cause some undesired side effects. First, some celebrities do not have genuine interest in helping the aid organizations because they only want to fulfill their personal motives. In fact, their participations is one sneaky way to take advantage of any aid organizations in order to boost their popularity, which those organizations never benefit from. Second, since public figures are famous for their specific talents, their followers will just focus on what those celebrities are known for instead of paying attention to the actual problems that need to be addressed. As a result, the aid organization have to compete with the very same celebrities for attention, which is obviously counterproductive.
On the other hand, I believe that the presence of celebrities is beneficial to the problems associated with aid organizations. One reason is that famous people have a widespread influence in the society, helping the aid organizations capture public attention. For example, world-class artists have been constantly involved in raising public awareness around the alarming issue of global warming, making a significant contribution to tackle this problem. Another reason is that being public figures, they have a deep understanding of the mentality and common sense of the general public. Consequently, they are able to find proper method to get the society to take actions against the problems, which lessens the burden on the aid organization themselves.
In conclusion, although the participation of celebrities in aid organizations is criticized by some people due to its distracting nature, I suppose the opposite is true.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-16 | thisisntt | 11 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | idid382003 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-04 | idid382003 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | Minyuu_Ivy | 73 | view |
- Some believe that more academic subjects such as chemistry physics and history should be taught in schools while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects such as motor mechanics and cooking Discuss both views 78
- Some people believe famous people support towards international aid organizations draws attention to problems Others think celebrities make the problems less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give you own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...f the mentality and common sense of the general public. Consequently, they are able to find pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, so, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60726072607 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23380476747 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557755775578 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8878316016 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.692307692 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283476433224 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109028154982 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640435251451 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190113523278 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377575791109 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.