In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
The emergence of single-person households and nuclear families over large, extended families is a dominant trend all over the world nowadays, especially in big cities. Personally, I completely argue that this trend would bring negative influences on society.
On the one hand, living alone or living in small family units can be deemed advantageous and necessary for some reasons. It can provide people a comfortable environment as they wish since whatever they do does not influence others and vice versa. For example, different generations want different things and many young people do not wish to live the traditional lifestyles of their parents and grandparents. As a result, living alone allows them the freedom to do as they please without having to face constant judgment or criticism. In addition, as people easily move to other cities or countries for a better working environment and chances in career, smaller family units are better to move and live together in different situations.
However, this trend also brings several drawbacks. Firstly, small family units mean less family support in many situations. For example, young people can more easily get financial aid from their adults or grandparents when living together and have less burden in managing the budgets of their own apartment rents or living expenses. Moreover, many societies consider it to be crucial that youngsters learn the family tradition or certain manners from the adults in the family. Secondly, as parents and grandparents get older, they may face a number of physical and mental health problems, and by living alone, they may lack the care and attention they need from their children. Finally, living alone, or in small family groups can lead to poor family bonds between generations.
In conclusion, I believe that while living alone or in a nuclear family is somewhat beneficial, it has more negative influences on the family bonds and leaves people susceptible to many potential risks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-05 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | nhidao2102 | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-10 | trachanhkhongmat | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-03 | dinhthu05 | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-15 | Lâm Yên Chi | 73 | view |
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 73
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Fossil fuels coal oil and natural gas are the main sources in many countries However in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy wind and solar energy are encouraged Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28075709779 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74307589475 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545741324921 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.860059268 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367905702839 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132020066446 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853011002928 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224573717591 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335647638527 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.