Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
It is thought that the exploitation of cultural traditions as a profitable business would contribute to its extinction. However, supporters believe that commercializing these aspects of culture will be the foundation of the preservation of traditions in the long-term. Arguments for and against will be clarified as follows.
Admittedly, traditional changes that drive commercialization can lead to the gradual loss of indigenous culture. Cultural uniqueness might be assimilated into alien cultures because local people carry out some small details but pose significant alterations to local activities and customs, ensuring that visitors may not encounter anything strange or scary. Particularly, several indigenous culinary traditions have been varied considerably to satisfy foreign tourists’ appetites. As a result, many dishes no longer preserve their original taste and becoming increasingly common as food tourism develops.
On the other hand, exploring tourism as a form of business can promote a positive transition which prevents cultural traditions from teetering on the brink of vanishing. In other words, possessing colorful substances and unique traditions, tourist destinations will attract more visitors, resulting in stimulating the booming of tourists. Hence, indigenous people not only can stabilize their lives by earning avenues from their arts and crafts but also keep craftsmanship alive. A good example is that ceramic villages foster their tradition and profit by providing tourists with pottery-making workshops in addition to souvenir products. Besides, regions, where are rich in tradition, can achieve economic development and increase employability in the hospitality industry by utilizing its local cultures and customs. This will help these tourist spots enhance facilities and infrastructures without relying on limited funding from governments.
In conclusion, while profit-making practices cause negative impacts on cultural features that should be taken into consideration, I believe that economic and cultural elements should be intermingled to preserve the core values of tradition and evolve along with social changes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-10 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | hongngocvo | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | cynnie.chan | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-11 | kmphuc041104 | 56 | view |
- Homework Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- The chart below shows the proportions of the world s oil resources held in different areas together with the proportions consumed annually in the same areas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 948, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng on limited funding from governments. In conclusion, while profit-making pract...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, may, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07166123779 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21933872008 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671009771987 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4221252796 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.142857143 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239598766658 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745891935415 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436392804032 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144171686541 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151687449917 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.