In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patrol man

Essay topics:

In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patrol, many drivers are exceeding the speed limit. Prunty County should instead undertake the same kind of road improvement project that Butler County completed five years ago: increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections. Today, major Butler County roads still have a 55 mph speed limit, yet there were 25 percent fewer reported accidents in Butler County this past year than there were five years ago.

In this editorial, author is throwing a light on the issues of prunty county highway saftey. Though they imposed new rules but they failed miserably because there was no impact on the number of accidents. So now they have decided to adopt the same kind of project of road improvement like butler county did five years ago and have reported less cases than before.However, the author assertion to adopt the same technique like butler country is baseless and not persuasive.The premises for my stand are pervasive throughout the passage.

Firstly, the road project which they are planning to execute in prunty county has no strong evidence through which it can be considered as the ideal solution . Butler county did this project five years ago implementing the same project now cannot provide strong evidence that the accidents might get reduced.This can be only implemented if the only reason behind this was bad conditions of roads.

In addition, the amount of vehicles passing through the butler county might be more than the number of vehicles in prunty county in this case road improvement project might have favoured their assumptions and planning . The same reason cannot be considered for prunty county as the reports suggest many are exceeding speed limit if there were bad conditions of road they might not have exceeded the speed limit.

Lastly,based on reports by the highway patrol they have found out that many drivers are exceeding speed limit.But there is no strong evidence to support this evidence how relevant data they have provided. There might be case only when they found out that they are exceeding speed limit but there might a case where they have missed the most important reason behind it.

In summary,there must be a strong evidence to support the authors assertion, proper comparison of timeline , data that suggests only solution to decrease traffic is to adopt the technique of road improvement.However in the absence of this the argument remains flawed.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-13 ssoham10 59 view
2022-08-10 Funmibeccy 68 view
2022-06-30 Meet0963 58 view
2022-06-23 Soumyadip Kar 63 view
2021-10-31 thER0CK 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Het Raval :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cases is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ty did five years ago and have reported less cases than before.However, the author a...
^^^^
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...nd have reported less cases than before.However, the author assertion to adopt the same...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 473, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... country is baseless and not persuasive.The premises for my stand are pervasive thr...
^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... can be considered as the ideal solution . Butler county did this project five yea...
^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ce that the accidents might get reduced.This can be only implemented if the only rea...
^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... favoured their assumptions and planning . The same reason cannot be considered fo...
^^
Line 9, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , based
...have exceeded the speed limit. Lastly,based on reports by the highway patrol they h...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
... many drivers are exceeding speed limit.But there is no strong evidence to support ...
^^^
Line 12, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...ortant reason behind it. In summary,there must be a strong evidence to support th...
^^^^^^
Line 12, column 59, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ust be a strong evidence to support the authors assertion, proper comparison of timelin...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 107, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...assertion, proper comparison of timeline , data that suggests only solution to dec...
^^
Line 12, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...adopt the technique of road improvement.However in the absence of this the argument rem...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 209, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...adopt the technique of road improvement.However in the absence of this the argument rem...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, so, in addition, in summary, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 326.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14417177914 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67477549046 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466257668712 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.6014792738 57.8364921388 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.7 119.503703932 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6 23.324526521 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.70786347227 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188773655019 0.218282227539 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910828285462 0.0743258471296 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055524692327 0.0701772020484 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106492091254 0.128457276422 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468437323803 0.0628817314937 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 14.3799401198 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.3550499002 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 333 350
No. of Characters: 1630 1500
No. of Different Words: 152 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.272 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.895 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.313 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 124 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 33.3 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.964 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.9 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.416 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.728 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.106 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5