Poor lifestyles have a negative impact on people's health. List some unhealthy lifestyles and discuss what government services could help?
Recently, the phenomenon of "poor lifestyles have a negative impact on people's health" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the role of welfare on poor lifestyles might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that government services can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, the role of government services about poor lifestyles can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that promoting the quality of people's life and well-being are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the role of governments in the society's health. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the effects of eating fast-food and the lack of physical activities distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of medical science, without the slightest doubt, negative impacts of poor lifestyles on people's health might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of diseases. Moreover, fundamental aspects of unhealthy lifestyles can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of exercises can pertain to extra working hours. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of poor lifestyles were correlated positively with the social welfare, the local authorities would ultimately address obesity issues. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of eating healthy foods.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of government services on the people's health far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-10 | sattar_iust | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | joyspacechou0130 | 77 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | joyspacechou0130 | 86 | view |
- Competitive environment in school or university is good or bad Discuss and give your own experiences as examples 80
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 to 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
- Students can obtain information of academic subject from online the printed books and articles and discussion with their teachers and their peers Which one is the most reliable source 85
- Today the high sales of popular goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real need of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- University tuition fees are increasing Some argue that higher education should be made free To what extend do you agree 77
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...he merits of government services on the peoples health far outweigh its downsides.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71280276817 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15191297172 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612456747405 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7466811328 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.090909091 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335632213329 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110082950197 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845780998779 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187280063776 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690527840922 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...he merits of government services on the peoples health far outweigh its downsides.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71280276817 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15191297172 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612456747405 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7466811328 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.090909091 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335632213329 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110082950197 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845780998779 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187280063776 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690527840922 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.