The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagram shows the change occur in west park Secondary school since it constructed in 1950.
Overall it can be seen, that west Secondary school had been changing since its build-in 1950. As we can see, in 1980 it was first renovated and had some major changes. After that in 2010, there is been a dramatic change in school and it is changing the whole structure.

As we can see from the map, the school was built in 1950 has four main areas. Firstly, there is a school by the side with hostels. Secondly, there is a land which is called Farmland, and with that, there is a playground for the students. Although the renovation has started in 1980, the school management was not happy with the renovation In 1980. The hostel section was removed and separated into two blocks called car park and science block. They also replaced farmland with the sports field. In the end, in 2010 there was a big change in school infrastructure, they increase the car park area but they still have not removed the sports field, though they decrease its size and it still has the science block for students.

In conclusion, although management was changing the structure of the school, but they were happy with the school building and playground, that is why in all those years they have not changed anything in those places.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-01 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 73 view
2022-11-16 Johndavisvu 78 view
2022-06-11 kevann 11 view
2022-01-09 kevann 73 view
2022-01-09 kevann view
Essays by user abashwini174@g… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not changed anything in those places.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69396551724 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38697774449 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508620689655 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.4938197311 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219495728454 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969785250951 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123035317116 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202621708171 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144901744146 0.0819641961636 177% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.