Globalization and multinational companies
Recent decades have witnessed tremendous achievements in globalization and the rise of multinational corporations. While there can be no doubt that these technologies can be beneficial to society in some ways, I am of the opinion that these so-called civilized developments have brought more harm than good.
Although these companies often bring people prosperity and modernization with global products and services, it cannot be denied it also makes them vulnerable to attack from totalitarian regimes. The fact is the threat from dictatorial cabal is increasing because they are becoming more skillful at mass propaganda and political corruption upon human rights. Indeed, some of them have been successfully brainwashing the majority of human beings since the evolution of mass media and industrialization started a century ago.
Another downside of multinational organizations is how it influences traditional values with materialistic ones. While globalization offers incessant quality products and economic opportunities, they also replace moral culture and belief with excess greed and craving for more and more comfort and convenience. Even though human beings are thriving in the peak of abundant materialistic globalization, but we can not claim that we have created a healthy globe without and within ourselves. Because of the fact that these companies exploit extravagantly from Mother Earth and human labor, including children, to meet our superfluous demand and gluttony. This obviously hurts society as well as nature.
In conclusion, society has become a “slightly less lovely” place regarding the adverse features of globalization. While multinational companies will continue to bring necessary materialistic economy, nonetheless, the damage that results from its formidable power of negative totalitarianism and its one-world dictatorship on people’s welfare and well-being, will, I fear, likely outweigh the benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-19 | nguyenanhquan | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | soodinzsh | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-03 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | nguyenanhquan | 95 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | nguyenanhquan | 95 | view |
- the table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996 and on possible projection high motorization scenario for their use in 2020 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 100
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 73
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 63
- The continued rise in the world s population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present time What are the causes of this continued rise Do you agree that it is the greatest problem faced by humanity 67
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: Because
...thy globe without and within ourselves. Because of the fact that these companies exploit extravagantly f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, nonetheless, regarding, so, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9219858156 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3357619039 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659574468085 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4243463659 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.166666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193603246879 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626599118067 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748715149917 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108401833594 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165097521535 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.