Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: children should spend most of
their time on studying and playing, they shouldn’t be required to help family with
household chores, such as cleaning and cooking.
It goes without saying that one’s life has different stages, the most important of which is childhood, that have a great influence on his or her adulthood behavior. Moreover, learning in the early stage of life in comparison with other one is easier. In this regard, I do not share this statement that are discussed in the title. Children should participate in household chores, as my perspective, by so doing not only do they become responsible but also they learn how manage their time. I will attempt to elaborate on my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First of all, a one’s being responsible plays a pivotal role as far as the success of any individual is concerned so much so that making relation and finding suitable job depends on it. In this regard, I believe that one should enjoy this ethical feature in childhood when his or her personality is being constructed. Whereas, if children did not enjoy responsibility, they could not learn it in one moment in 18th birthday by him- or her-self. As my experience, for instance, when I was just an eight-year-old daughter, I had to clean my room biweekly, therefore I learned this is my duty that if I did it very well some awards were waited for me; however, if I did not it some punishment were waited for me. Inasmuch as, I learned how be responsible as well as managing my time.
Secondly, managing time, the best skill should be learned, could effect on a broad spectrum of tasks, many of which can determine the statue of one’s social position. In my opinion, the children who just have to do their school assignment, put playing before doing their homework. On the other hand, children whose tasks involve home works as school and chores as household can manage their time and make a plan to schedule their assignments. For example, my son, who is nine, have to buy toast bread every other day, so he set a plan in his calendar that reminds him this task, which are as a result of their manager skill. Therefore, he learns how use tools in order to manage his assignments.
All of all, having aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I believe that doing chores could prepare children for life in the society as a responsible and manager man. Therefore, I definitely suggest that parents involve their children doing domestic work.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-09-08 | Negintavakkoli | 76 | view |
- having different teachers 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what field they study in 70
- Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s development 70
- Do you agree or disagree The way people dress is a good indication of their personality or character 80
- Do you agree or disagree Internet should be like other services such as roads and government should provide it to the public with no cost 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...the best skill should be learned, could effect on a broad spectrum of tasks, many of w...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75186104218 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73795900871 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531017369727 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9671178273 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.647058824 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7058823529 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.45110844103 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195877185187 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673153393583 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052927395432 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126474839022 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044716067346 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.